|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments (4)
Feed
Post a Comment
| Pdunn @ 2007-06-04 13:33:46 | |
 |
I'll have to wait until other moderators weigh in; however, I don't think this camo pattern qualifies as a mural.
|
| kjfitz @ 2007-06-04 13:38:13 | |
 |
Definition: "A large painted picture extending over a wall or other monumental surface."
It isn't explicitly a "picture" but since it isn't really camouflage it must be some form of art. To me that would make it a mural. |
| Pdunn @ 2007-06-04 15:13:44 | |
|
|
Sounds good to me. Good job, Alfjon!
|
| jbottero @ 2007-06-04 15:54:00 | |
 |
But it's obviously camo. It isn't "exactly" a picture because it isn't a picture. I mean, obviously a roof can have a mural, but there is some artistic intent in a mural. A random camo pattern on a roof could be many things, but it's not likly a mural...
Unless the definition has wide lattitude... |
|
Post a Comment:
(Policies)
Please log in if you don't want to post anonymously (anonymous users cannot post links) |